No, I didn't mean that. I want to build a sequencer for my modular and this is what I'll have, I'm just saying I think a clone of the Matrisequencer maybe hard because I've never seen matrixes for sale in any electronics parts store.Jarp2600 wrote:Jarrekid: IMO it's not too difficult to build a step-loopsequencer. It's the easiest sequencer there is. You need a chip that "loops" 16 steps and a CV controller.
It's really a matter of preferences. I find the sequencer in Reason very intuitive and nice to work with. And on top of that you got the Matrix as well, which is a nice addition.Equin(00)xe2 wrote:You'd soon see that Computers dont aid you...It blights your attention,so you actually think your better off using one

How on earth did you get this??????????? I'm really gratefull for this!!! Thank you 1000x!!! If you where a girl I would have kissed youZubiko wrote:I have found this picture by chance and I thought it should interest you
Your opinion, not law!LeoDaV wrote:And for those who think (I have no)reason matrix seuencer is cool or protools or cubase sx or <fill in your sequencer> is cool for sequencing are WRONG! since they sux....
Just below that quote is:AnDrOiD wrote:Your opinion, not law!LeoDaV wrote:And for those who think (I have no)reason matrix seuencer is cool or protools or cubase sx or <fill in your sequencer> is cool for sequencing are WRONG! since they sux....
I hoped that made clear it's my taste/opinon... if not then forgive me..LeoDaV wrote:I know it surely has to do with tase... so above is my taste
As far as I can see it definately is the Croissy studio before the demise... and judging by the hardware present: just before/during Chronologie or after...(hint: the JD800 is there)Mogwai wrote:Cool.Is this picture and the rest from that serie taken in Jarres studio then?












