Jarrepeggiator wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 3:47 am
Richard-Eastham wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:10 am
No local choirs, no live drummer and no marionettes or extra stage interest.
Local choirs... for what, The Architect or Azimuth or Herbalizer? Many of you seem to totally disregard the fact that he is playing a very different type of music today, so he can't go on stage with 50 musicians, because you can recreate most of these tracks on stage from zero by having several people in front of keyboards. How could he play The Architect, a Detroit techno influenced song with a very fast, repetitive melody and very digital beat like that, like a rockband? No electronic musicians go on stage like that today, that's impossible with the electronic music produced on modern softwares. And Jarre is not interested in retro shows like that. That kind of shows were the product of the 80s. He could play his early tracks like that, but he wants to create a coherent sound to a concert.
And when it comes to setting, I can totally understand why he doesn't want to travel around Europe and use some cheesy, dated 80s looks in front of a new, younger crowd. You could also ask why he now has short hair and why he wears darker clothes instead of the colorful red or green suits and things like that. Well, because it's 2025.
A choir joined him on stage just last year in Bratislava for Second Rendezvous, did you forget? It was one of highlights of the show, a show that also included tracks like Herbalizer and Azimuth. These things are not mutually exclusive.
In terms of setting, I'm not asking for a return to a "... cheesy, dated 80s look" (where did I say that?) but what I'm asking for is a distinctive staging approach that will continue to give a JMJ show (in 2025 just as it did in 1979 onwards) a particular identity that offers a point of difference from other contemporary pop, rock, hip hop touring shows on the road this year.
Squishing the JMJ experience into a standard 'black box stage' that is dropped into a series of amazing locations has huge potential, but only if he breaks outside of conventional scenography constrained by that box.
My concern is the visual potential these locations offer will not be realised if his staging is too timid, or too ordinary. Would you agree?