Welcome to the new BlahBlahCafe!

Having trouble registering? You can contact us at the "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page.

The boards have been moved to a new server. If you have trouble signing in, or other problems on the boards, feel free to contact us.

All boards have been restored for Guests now.

Roland SH 201


Post Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:44 am
dj_epo


User avatar
Posts: 135
Location: FRANCE - Nantes

Image

The new roland has come !

It is an analog-modeling synth, and fell really simple to use and have a very good look !!!

I think we will see it with jarre soon.

He had use the SH101 in calypso, and this one seems better !!!!


arf, I buy it or not ????
Last edited by dj_epo on Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:46 am
Nico_Noyau
Assistant Admin & Bootleg Expert

 User avatar
Posts: 5682
Location: Aix en Provence, France
Likes received  : 1

I don't like new synths, too "numeric" for me, I prefer real analogs :P
Buy a SH101 :D
Image Image
My music, webdev, photos, videos : www.nicolaskern.fr
Robert Dugenou

Attended :
Teo&Tea showcase in Cannes [France] - 20/05/2007
Théâtre Marigny, Paris [France] - 15/12/2007
<2010> Marseille [France] - 20/03/2010
Monaco - 01/07/2011
Arènes de Nîmes – 14/07/2016
Post Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:57 am
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

 User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

Don't like it's look...

I would prefer a SH1 or SH2 over a SH101, though... :roll:
Post Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:58 pm
Jakob BC
English Moderator, Studio/Stage Expert

 User avatar
Posts: 4344
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

I do like it mostly because of the Super Saw. It is lacking memory and people who have tried it says it doesn't sound very analog. I like it for being easy to control.
I don't think it more comparable to the old SH serie than other VAs.
Post Posted Tue Apr 04, 2006 6:41 pm
jeremy


User avatar
Posts: 261
Location: Tournai, Belgium

I think it looks good. It probably sounds good as well. I think I'd prefer a JP8000 instead (ribbon, display with names, etc.)
Post Posted Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:32 pm
Robi


Posts: 3340
Location: Kiskoros, Hungary

It seems very nice! Good look. Maybe Jarre would use it...
"I will release my next album at the end of this year"
Post Posted Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:37 pm
Jakob BC
English Moderator, Studio/Stage Expert

 User avatar
Posts: 4344
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

I doubt JMJ will use it but you never know, he has started to use many weird synths.

I always wondered why he never used a Juno-6/60/106, I remember someone said that itprobably wasn't advanced enough.
Post Posted Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:09 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

 User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

Well, that's bullshit, you know. That doesn't mean it can be used for some very nice sounds... :P
Post Posted Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:17 pm
jeremy


User avatar
Posts: 261
Location: Tournai, Belgium

Synthesist wrote:I always wondered why he never used a Juno-6/60/106, I remember someone said that itprobably wasn't advanced enough.
Yes it was mentionned on the old forum. He prefered the Jupiter. Maybe he used a Juno on RendezVous for only 1 track but I'm not sure.
Post Posted Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:00 pm
Velodynamic


User avatar
Posts: 3472
Location: Sweden, far north
Likes given: 1
Likes received  : 9

I like it just because Jarre is intereted by testing it (according to Rimbert's reports). :mrgreen:

http://www.rolandus.com/products/produc ... jectId=769

Ah...I want I want I want... :P
Post Posted Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:54 pm
radek tymecki


User avatar
Posts: 959

Synthesist wrote:I doubt JMJ will use it but you never know, he has started to use many weird synths.

I always wondered why he never used a Juno-6/60/106, I remember someone said that itprobably wasn't advanced enough.
He had Jupiter 8 ;) :P
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:43 am
jeremy


User avatar
Posts: 261
Location: Tournai, Belgium

though vangelis used a juno 106 (on the right):

http://elsew.com/data/sndst1_b.jpg
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:05 am
jarrekid


User avatar
Posts: 1100
Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire, England

I want to try this, but I'm not expecting much more than what my microKorg can already give me. As Nico said, I'm also going into the DIY analog thing now and that seems to be the way for me. I'm also looking out for second hand SH-101s.
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:19 am
Nico_Noyau
Assistant Admin & Bootleg Expert

 User avatar
Posts: 5682
Location: Aix en Provence, France
Likes received  : 1

jarrekid wrote:I want to try this, but I'm not expecting much more than what my microKorg can already give me. As Nico said, I'm also going into the DIY analog thing now and that seems to be the way for me. I'm also looking out for second hand SH-101s.
The microKORG seems to be a great machine, not very expensive. For sure, less attractive at a first view but I hope I'll test one one day :P
And hurray for DIY analog, real analogs are so expensive for us...
Image Image
My music, webdev, photos, videos : www.nicolaskern.fr
Robert Dugenou

Attended :
Teo&Tea showcase in Cannes [France] - 20/05/2007
Théâtre Marigny, Paris [France] - 15/12/2007
<2010> Marseille [France] - 20/03/2010
Monaco - 01/07/2011
Arènes de Nîmes – 14/07/2016
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:08 am
Jakob BC
English Moderator, Studio/Stage Expert

 User avatar
Posts: 4344
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

radek tymecki wrote:
Synthesist wrote:I doubt JMJ will use it but you never know, he has started to use many weird synths.

I always wondered why he never used a Juno-6/60/106, I remember someone said that itprobably wasn't advanced enough.
He had Jupiter 8 ;) :P
I still don't get it, alot musicians have used both the Junos and the Jupiters. The dutch producer Legowelt bought a Juno-106 then a Jupiter 8 and then a Juno-60 like many others, he can get different sounds from the Junos. I don't think that he had a Jupiter-8 was a reason not to get a Juno-60 or 106 :)







    • 2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software