You could simply solder in a clock input where the clock generator is connected to the sequencer within the drum machine. That would mean one clock input (from another sequencer or clock generator) controlling 20 sounds via one sync'd sequence.GeeJee wrote:Either it's midified or controlled by CV/Gate (hell of a job, with 20? different sounds). Another possibility is that it's sampled.
Thanks! That's always good to know.Elf wrote:Jarre told me during my interview with him that the reason they went for a computer sequencer in stead was that a) The sequencer was just too heavy and fragile and b) it broke down the week before the tourJakob BC wrote: For this tour the Digisequencer was replaced by the computer sequencer.
JMJ knowing, that would probably be Ableton Live, or perhaps ProTools. But what difference would that make?JPQ wrote:What kind software sequencer is used?
some people want use same synths and ask them many questons and some one collecting them. i dont understand why this thing is not important. its nice know what jarre uses even i dont like same stuff i dont like Ableton Live when i looked this.Jarp2600 wrote:JMJ knowing, that would probably be Ableton Live, or perhaps ProTools. But what difference would that make?JPQ wrote:What kind software sequencer is used?
I understand that people like to use the same synths that JMJ uses, because of the characteristic sounds. But whatever kind of sequencer software you use, the output will be exactly the same. It's just his working platform. It's almost the same as asking what kind of wallpapers or carpet he has...JPQ wrote:some people want use same synths and ask them many questons and some one collecting them. i dont understand why this thing is not important. its nice know what jarre uses even i dont like same stuff i dont like Ableton Live when i looked this.Jarp2600 wrote:JMJ knowing, that would probably be Ableton Live, or perhaps ProTools. But what difference would that make?JPQ wrote:What kind software sequencer is used?