I'm NOT a morning person.
Nor am I!Leelene wrote:I am not saying that as an adult with a bad background that you can be lazy and not work with it. I am just saying that alot of things could be prevented and alot of people could be better of if there was some guidence along the way.
... 
Leelene wrote:I think I am missunderstood a bit here. I am not saying that as an adult with a bad background that you can be lazy and not work with it. I am just saying that alot of things could be prevented and alot of people could be better of if there was some guidence along the way. Not like a parenting-police or any sort of maffia-like treatment. But just a little tiny help when needed. And that you do have a great knowledge from the start of parentinghood. Knowing of different kinds of way to bring up a child and what is a good way of solving things is not wrong to know.
Love Leelene
Ronja wrote:Just an example...some time ago people tried to lynch the murderer of nine years-old boy while police were escorting him to court...don't misunderstand me, probably if I was a mother of this child I'd like him to be killed or something (to be clear - I'm against death penalty, but people often change their minds in such situations)...but my first question was: where are all these people when they hear neighbours' children beaten? What do they these from pathological families?
That all is really worrying me...
Equin(00)xe...now I feel bit misunderstood...for me words "It's sad that there's no parenting-license" means nothing more than "it's sad that some people who NEVER should have children (and who even HAVEN"T wanted to have any) bring up some". I'm not saying about controollin anybody, it's ridicoulus...
But how do you prevent either???sometimes even the most unlikely cases of family units suffer psychological issues that could scar.And there's a HUGE difference between mistakes that every parent does, because it's natural that you learn during all child's life to be a parent, and mistakes, which make children not allowed to live normally, which takes them chance from the start
What defines a happy childhood???There is a sentence: "Nobody had happy childhood" (I think it's some psychologist's sentence)...everyone can find mistakes of his parents, but there're mistakes and MISTAKES.
Sure it is,that would be my first reaction if indeed anyone harmed my child,but were all someones "Son or Daughter" when does its start becoming Justified to act this way.Referring to this case of murder...I totally agree that it'd lead to anything, I was just saying that my first instict as a mother would probably be to kill him. Which I didn't say is good.
At such a Young age sometimes its hard to accept that perhaps this particular boy was "mentally developed" enough to murder yet still seen in society to be seen Immature enough to not understand his actions,those sorts of cases are rare,most impulsive situations of murder are not connected with systematic,or psychological trauma at such a young age,its true that maybe this boy had been influenced or scarred by his fathers actions,but i hardly think it was a timebomb waiting to go off,this young boy would hardly have been able to calculate or be aware of his emotional state to really understand the principle of his actions,but that doesnt mean its any less a reason to do it,it could have been prevented ,but again how can you predict it.but you could see it as a connection between his own trauma and why his murdered,that is always the first correlation.But what I was really trying to say is that I noticed that many people here, in Poland, don't see any connections between someone's childhood and who he becomes later. I ment...take this murderer, who, according to what I believe in, couldn't be a normal, happy person (normal happy people don't kill). Probably (it's just an example there might not be the only reason) he was grown up brought up by father-alcoholic (alcoholism is a big problem here, where I live). For, let's say, 15 years of his life, nearly day by day, he was watching his drunk father beating his mother. (I'm not saying that every brutal alcoholics' child becomes a murder, not at all, just try to show probable reason of someone's problems with psychic).
My question was: do people, who watch such situations and do anything (and that's how many peole act, there's a stupid thinking that "these're family affairs") have moral right to lynch this murderer?
we all have.Sometimes talking in Public is not a bad thing but it helps to ease the burden of unrest,Its hard to accept certain things,and by ignoring it ,maybe feel that we are all dealing with it.....but at the same time its good to try understand why perhaps it so that things happen.And believe me, it doesn't all look like in UK or Sweden - this country is even shown by journalist as the place where children are treated the best in Europe. Here's is still thinking that "family is saint", that "people shouldn't talk in public about family's problems"...it's changing but we still have to learn much.
Exactly!Synthesist wrote:Like above?AnDrOiD wrote:I hate reading long essays.![]()
You're stubborn to use the word "license"Equin(00)xe wrote: But how do you prevent either???sometimes even the most unlikely cases of family units suffer psychological issues that could scar.
How do you allow one person to live,by a guiding set of rules by allowing them to "earn the right" to parenting by license??
Sure. And that's what teases me...Equin(00)xe wrote:Children who have a loving family home and damn good parents can still turn out to be "Angered" or revengeful,even if a parent has the License,are they then considered bad parents because a close family member or family friend sexually abused their child truning them into a monster later in life who goes on to repeat the cycle of emotional trauma dealt to them. Having a license would not prevent that!!!
The sentence I've written ("nobody had happy childhood") is a little bit tricky.Equin(00)xe wrote: What defines a happy childhood???
TrueEquin(00)xe wrote:A person could punish there child for one mistake but in every other sense of the word loved that child unconditionally but that could scar them for life,turn them into a serial rapist of murderer,someone who didnt punish there child,could turn out a dictator,again its a subjective thing
Yeah, I agree-->first sentence of this postEquino(00)xe wrote:the same could apply to a License to become a parent....some could earn the license to raise a child but would that stop certain people turning out how they do...you can't curb society that way.
But the murderer wasn't a teenager or a child..the victim was 9 year-old boy, but he was killed by an adult.Equin(00)xe wrote: At such a Young age sometimes its hard to accept that perhaps this particular boy was "mentally developed" enough to murder yet still seen in society to be seen Immature enough to not understand his actions,those sorts of cases are rare,most impulsive situations of murder are not connected with systematic,or psychological trauma at such a young age,its true that maybe this boy had been influenced or scarred by his fathers actions,but i hardly think it was a timebomb waiting to go off,this young boy would hardly have been able to calculate or be aware of his emotional state to really understand the principle of his actions,but that doesnt mean its any less a reason to do it,it could have been prevented ,but again how can you predict it.but you could see it as a connection between his own trauma and why his murdered,that is always the first correlation.
Yeah, that's what I feel.Equin(00)xe wrote: Ignorance will only drive the root of the problem further and much more severity will gather with it..