Page 1 of 3
New synth
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:44 pm
by Mogan
I'm gonna buy a small, effective synth, and were thinking of the Korg Microsynth, because of the size, (but also the vocoder...

) but I wonder if anybody else here has it or have anything to say about it...
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:06 pm
by Nico_Noyau
MicroWhat ? I never heard about it....
Maybe you speak about the microKORG ? If yes, it is a very good synth

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:33 pm
by GeeJee
Microsynth is KORG's new synth....

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:43 pm
by Equinoxe
GeeJee wrote:Microsynth is KORG's new synth....

Quite a Nifty piece of gear,given that its based on the Triton Engine,it has some good sounds on it,Its kind of like a slimmed down Triton LE with a 2 octave keyboard...
Aimed more for the Laptop/Desktop musician or some one who wants great sounds without a great budget,think its around the £4-500 mark
the actual name is Micro X
I'm not sure if its availible yet in Europe,last time i spoke to my friend he said they hadnt begun production as yet and were only shipping demo units to the States.I'm still waiting to demo one in the UK

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:53 pm
by jarrekid
The MicroX is basically a Triton yes, in a different shape. This is good if you want digital sounds (pads, pianos, strings, etc.)
The microKorg is good for "analog" sounds (basses, leads) and is a super synth.
Buying both would be a good choice.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:08 pm
by Mogan
MicroX is like a Triton but smaller. MicroKorg is another name on Microsynth. I were just wondering of expirience of it, not a name discussion...

But thanks for the answers. I'll maybe buy the MicroX later. In half a year or something.
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:40 pm
by GeeJee
Well, what's your current setup? And do you have any experience in synthesis or programming sounds...?
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:09 am
by jarrekid
MicroKorg - better for beginners definitely.
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:28 am
by Nico_Noyau
For my case, I would have vote for a midi keyboard with a lot of VSTs which can be found for free on internet (legally

) and after, Mogan can choose which type of synthesis he loves or which kind of synth he really want (synthesis or PCM or other).
So for my case I would buy a cheap synth like the D50 is, it has great sounds and can be used as master keyboard.
But that's only IMHO, that's how I am discovering synthesis and how synths really work and it doesn't cost me more than 300€ (included D50, PG1000 and soundcard).
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:34 am
by AnDrOiD
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:13 am
by GeeJee
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:37 pm
by PHASEREFFECT
Me thinks (as curious it sounds, since it comes from -my- mouth!), it doesn´t matter if you use a DSP-driven Synth or Software, so i think that you´ll be with a cheapo Master-KB with a good Software in the result more than happy.And good free Software-Synths are more than enough outside there. My experience with VA wasn´t that good, since they´re all more or less cheap build, so when your MKorg/MSynth/MS2K/whatever dies, you´ll have only a piece of unusable Software inside of a DSP. Ok, you -have- something in your hands. 2K for example, nowadays usually not more worth than $300-$400, payed for mine about 6 Years ago over the double price. And their price won´t rise, except those, who are mainly known and much used in the pro-world, but the 2K definitive doesn´t belong there. On one kind seen i like this machine, on the other side i hate it.
I´ll give you the tip: Better concentrate yourself into making good music instead of never ending synth maintenance and correcting bad output signals. It kills your creativity like hell. No question, personally i still hate Software, cause the investment costs for a pro-studio bulild around software is still not cheaper than using "real" hardware and real analogue gear -has- simply a better quality, but meanwhile i say: Better a full analogue setup -or- software. This mixage of "half-analogue", VA and pure analogue equipment won´t work together without problems. And the listener doesn´t matter how "analogue" a sound appears, he only wanna get "included" into the "beauty" of your songs. Additionally, nowadays the person behind the music doesn´t interest no more, cause music has got a "consumer product", not a life attitude or a personal relationship like it was 20/30 years ago. Consider that in your choice.
Greetings
Stef
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:07 pm
by AnDrOiD
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:57 pm
by Mogan
Jørk. I started woth something like that. I think it was a GEM...

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:12 pm
by Jakob BC
Mogan wrote:
Jørk. I started woth something like that. I think it was a GEM...

So now GEM is ranked as something less good?
That doesn't matter, I don't know the quality of GEM.