Welcome to the new BlahBlahCafe!

Having trouble registering? You can contact us at the "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page.

The boards have been moved to a new server. If you have trouble signing in, or other problems on the boards, feel free to contact us.

en attendant Cousteau vs. En attendant Cousteau


Post Posted Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:45 am
(Unknown)
Foster parent to lost posts

 User avatar
Posts: 1

A QUESTION???

I have 2 copies of En attendant Cousteau.

en attendant Cousteau DDD recording level & En attendant Cousteau ADD recording level. Both with the same catalog number and both from France.

Which is correct and which one was printed first?

Image Image
(Thanks to Oliver for the images!)
This user is not the original creator of this post, but was kind enough to adopt it. If you are or know the original poster, send Dr_Jones a PM here: https://zoolook.nl/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&u=47
Post Posted Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:48 am
(Unknown)
Foster parent to lost posts

 User avatar
Posts: 1

dunno which one was first, but what I know besides the differences between "ADD" and "DDD" recordings is that there is a slight difference on the front cover as well... :-)

btw: they're both "correct" releases...
This user is not the original creator of this post, but was kind enough to adopt it. If you are or know the original poster, send Dr_Jones a PM here: https://zoolook.nl/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&u=47
Post Posted Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:31 am
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

 User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

I think it should be ADD, as JMJ was using tape machines upto Oxygene 7-13 to record his albums. But I'm not 100% sure.
:mrgreen:
Post Posted Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:24 pm
(Unknown)
Foster parent to lost posts

 User avatar
Posts: 1

yes, I guess so too, as the "ADD" reappeared in all other releases worldwide, so methinks that the "DDD" was 'only' a French thing to have an enhanced (?) version for the local market
This user is not the original creator of this post, but was kind enough to adopt it. If you are or know the original poster, send Dr_Jones a PM here: https://zoolook.nl/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&u=47
Post Posted Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
(Unknown)
Foster parent to lost posts

 User avatar
Posts: 1

I don't think so: new recording is new mixing is new mastering, so the result always will be a bit different. In that case there are two different sounding WfC's.
This user is not the original creator of this post, but was kind enough to adopt it. If you are or know the original poster, send Dr_Jones a PM here: https://zoolook.nl/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&u=47
Post Posted Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:46 am
moviemaker


Posts: 526
Location: HollywoodLAND

GeeJee wrote:I think it should be ADD, as JMJ was using tape machines upto Oxygene 7-13 to record his albums. But I'm not 100% sure.
GeeJee I think you are correct! It should be ADD. The DDD I think is a misprint. Does this mean that the correct title is "En" attendant Cousteau instead of "en" I think I've seen it capatilized later on for other releases :?:
Post Posted Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:26 am
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

 User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

moviemaker wrote:
GeeJee wrote:I think it should be ADD, as JMJ was using tape machines upto Oxygene 7-13 to record his albums. But I'm not 100% sure.
GeeJee I think you are correct! It should be ADD. The DDD I think is a misprint. Does this mean that the correct title is "En" attendant Cousteau instead of "en" I think I've seen it capatilized later on for other releases :?:
Can't say - I don't have any polydors with "En"....
:mrgreen:







    • 2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software