Page 1 of 8
Geiss Matrisequencer 250
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:00 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Hi
Zubiko just gave me this picture, I found it very interesting, so I decided to post it here
Note the CD of Vangelis @left
It is my dream to build a matrix sequencer, if someone made one/will make one, let me know
I think it is one of the best sequencer I've ever seen
One more time, congratulations to Michel Geiss
But enough speaking, here is the picture
:
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:09 pm
by Zubiko
I have found this picture by chance and I thought it should interest you
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:15 pm
by jarrekid
hmm, it may be hard to find/build matrixes, I've never seen them DIYed or anything like that.
Where's the Vangelis CD?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:20 pm
by Jarp2600
It seems me to be a very easy way to program loop sequences. I like it!
@ Jarrekid: IMO it's not too difficult to build a step-loopsequencer. It's the easiest sequencer there is. You need a chip that "loops" 16 steps and a CV controller.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:24 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Vangelis CD is the third of the lower line of CDs at left
Okay Jarp2600, make the schematics so
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:30 pm
by Jarp2600
Ahem... Did I say anything?!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:45 pm
by GeeJee
Nice, but nothing too special imho. At least not compared to what todays protools can do...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:00 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Yeah, sure, but in terms of look, you enter in a homestudio with a Matrisequencer, you are
,
, and you want it too so you are
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:08 pm
by Jarp2600
GeeJee wrote:Nice, but nothing too special imho. At least not compared to what todays protools can do...
Nah, protools. Computers can do everything. There's one very difference between Hardware and Software!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:17 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Well, it is like a Yamaha 01V !
But I prefer ProTools
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:25 pm
by Jarp2600
I don't!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:27 pm
by Equin(00)xe2
Jarp2600 wrote:GeeJee wrote:Nice, but nothing too special imho. At least not compared to what todays protools can do...
Nah, protools. Computers can do everything. There's one very difference between Hardware and Software!
Hardwares far more stable and reliable!!!
Given the choice I'd Much prefer to work with the Geiss Sequencer than arse about with a Software sequencer.....
You have more physical abilities than just piddling around with a Mouse,far more intuitive and flexible both for presequencing nad live use
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:29 pm
by Jarp2600
Agreed! (hey, a new face here! First thought you were our first Equin(00)xe)
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:32 pm
by Equin(00)xe2
I'd like to see how many of you have actually used a "real" Hardware analog sequencer....I'm not talking about workstation sequencer but real Analog sequencers(and none of those VST Arp modulations either)
You'd soon see that Computers dont aid you...It blights your attention,so you actually think your better off using one
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:36 pm
by Jarp2600
I have a MC300, but the diskdrive doesn't work for a fully 100% anymore
But that's not exactly this topic.