Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Yeah right, Pat can go to the shop and just see the bikinis for that. He no need to see a female body in the bikini. Anyway, I just speak on behalf of the womanhood. 
Jean-Michel Jarre discussion forum
https://zoolook.nl/forum/
Was it at some JMJ performance?
Kanta wrote:I really hope she accepted your explanation. Especially if you were starring at the photo of Anne in a bikini. That must be a tricky one.
Velodynamic wrote:I could pm them directly in private to Pat insted, no?
Velodynamic wrote:Was it at some JMJ performance?
Hi Emer, you deserve it.Pat Gleeson wrote:Kanta wrote:I really hope she accepted your explanation. Especially if you were starring at the photo of Anne in a bikini. That must be a tricky one.
This is Emer, Pat's wife here. I have it all sorted - I got his credit card, and I can treat myself to what anything I want !![]()
![]()
I have seen them. You can't not, if you do the search in her name only. Haven't tried with her name and added on fully clothed, though.Velodynamic wrote:I know much more "revealing" images of Anne Parillaud.
This is just one of the reasons why I choosed not to link them on these forum pages.![]()
I could pm them directly in private to Pat insted, no?
Ok, I can almost see the hard suffering situation you're in right now, so I'll leave it for now.Pat Gleeson wrote: Please dont !I'm in enough trouble already - my wallet's emptied ...
![]()
![]()
How is it possible you've seen them if I have never posted them?Kanta wrote: I have seen them. You can't not, if you do the search in her name only. Haven't tried with her name and added on fully clothed, though.

.