LeoDaV wrote:IF YOU BREAK OFF A SMALL PART OF THE FERRITE CORE YOU WILL HAVE CHANGED THE WAVEFORM IT PRODUCES!
LUSH! I wanna do that!
Wooozers! A circuit-bend Eminent!
Don't say that word too loud, Jarrekid can hear you !!!
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:13 pm
by GeeJee
noyau wrote:
GeeJee wrote:
jarrekid wrote:
LUSH! I wanna do that!
Wooozers! A circuit-bend Eminent!
Don't say that word too loud, Jarrekid can hear you !!!
OH well, I didn't spell it right. Should've been CIRCUIT-BENT....
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:18 am
by jarrekid
Wha?!?! lol
I only call it circuit bending when it's a digital instrument. When it's analog, I just call it modifying.
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:38 pm
by Nico_Noyau
jarrekid wrote:Wha?!?! lol
I only call it circuit bending when it's a digital instrument. When it's analog, I just call it modifying.
(check your forum, OMGz )
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:14 pm
by Martman
*bump*
Y'know, sometimes I wonder what's all this about the Eminent 310 Unique. Has anyone of you ever had the chance to try an Eminent 2000 Grand Theatre? I had. Not only is it a beauty, but its string ensemble (and that's what it's all about, isn't it) has way more features than that of a 310.
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:01 pm
by Equinoxe
Martman wrote:*bump*
Y'know, sometimes I wonder what's all this about the Eminent 310 Unique. Has anyone of you ever had the chance to try an Eminent 2000 Grand Theatre? I had. Not only is it a beauty, but its string ensemble (and that's what it's all about, isn't it) has way more features than that of a 310.
Yes I got offered a GT2000 when i was searching for a 310U,its a later model(produced in the early 80s(I think) and almost twice the size to a 310,I 've also tried out several other Eminent models that had the SE,theres a 1600 and a P240 and theres a couple of B series ones i tried,whilst they may incorporate the 3 phase string system they didn't sound exactly like the 310
The GT2000 has the string ensemble but it doesnt have the same analog Orbitone circuitry like that of the 310,Most Eminents had the SE but they don't sound as sweet as the 310,effectively you could achieve the same results with any Eminent SE equipped organ +Plus Smallstone phaser,which in theory is fine,but its the not the exact instrument model that Jarre used,and I guarantee that unless you have a 310U/Theatre model you won't have the same Lead sounds that Jarreused on
Oxygene/Equinoxe/Oxygene 7-13..
Its not only the SE that Jarre used off the 310,there are other sounds too,so whilst you maybe getting the SE on a GT2000 your not getting all the others,so infact having the exact model is precisely why people hunt for the 310 as opposed for other Eminent substitutes,if you only want the strings then fine,you can replicate all the other Oxygene/Equinoxe lead sounds on a decent Analog/VA
Not sure about others but Part of the Appeal of the 310 for me is that its the exact model Jarre used,you can say whats the appeal of it,but unless you own one you wouldn't quite understand..Its a mediocre mchine for sure,but a Holy grail to the keys player Jarre Fan
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:56 pm
by radek tymecki
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:36 pm
by Analog-Umph
Great work Radek, once again very inspirational.
I just saw this and the D-50 video!
Kick ass man, awesome!
Very nice work!
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:03 pm
by Velodynamic
A version of a part from Tubular Bells II with an Eminent 310:
Would it be possible to make a soundfont of Oxygene 8, Oxygene 13, equinoxe 7 strings?
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:52 pm
by radek tymecki
Well.... No
Because the strings have sustain phaser effect. The effect is working even if You're not playing so i suggest to download PerKristians soundfont and make some experiments with VST's phaser
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:53 pm
by radek tymecki
Anyway...
Here's sth that You might need Same tempo as in original one
)
