Page 4 of 5

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:57 pm
by Nico_Noyau
It is a sock :mrgreen:

What about the AERO underwear ? Or Cic brief ? :mrgreen:

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:22 pm
by AnDrOiD
Oooops! :P :mrgreen:

Image

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:34 pm
by Velodynamic
noyau wrote:It is a sock :mrgreen:

What about the AERO underwear ? Or Cic brief ? :mrgreen:
OHH please god, help me from this!! :? :lol:

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:34 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Velodynamic wrote:
noyau wrote:It is a sock :mrgreen:

What about the AERO underwear ? Or Cic brief ? :mrgreen:
OHH please god, help me from this!! :? :lol:
Uh ?

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:33 pm
by GeeJee
Ronja wrote:
GeeJee wrote:I don't see what all the negative fuzz is all about.
C.o.m.m.e.r.c.i.a.l.i.z.a.t.i.o.n :P
B.l.a.m.e..t.h.e.m... :P

I don't mind JM cashing in on his own artwork (or at least, the artwork that has been created for him), AT ALL :D

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:34 pm
by Ronja
GeeJee wrote: don't mind JM cashing in on his own artwork (or at least, the artwork that has been created for him), AT ALL :D
Neither I. The point is that's not the artwork. AT ALL :P

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:47 pm
by Velodynamic
noyau wrote:
Velodynamic wrote:
noyau wrote:It is a sock :mrgreen:

What about the AERO underwear ? Or Cic brief ? :mrgreen:
OHH please god, help me from this!! :? :lol:
Uh ?
Underwear with the text "AERO" on their back?!!!!
Aweful.
Oh, or maybe you ment the Aero eyes...well, not much better in my point of view. :lol:
What did you mean, Noyau? Please let me know. :D

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:52 pm
by Jakob BC
Velodynamic wrote:
noyau wrote:
Velodynamic wrote: OHH please god, help me from this!! :? :lol:
Uh ?
Underwear with the text "AERO" on their back!!!!

Aweful.
This is not cool IMO. But I think the assotment of items is the same everywhere, could be an idea from Warner music which is also making stuff for other genres like the MTV music where some people find any type of merchandise important.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:22 pm
by Finaero
I wouldn't mind for a girl to wear Aero/China/Le Parc thongs, though. >_>

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:28 pm
by Jakob BC
Finaero wrote:I wouldn't mind for a girl to wear Aero/China/Le Parc thongs, though. >_>
That's a whole other thing, you can just ignore what is pictured on it, if it's just like a symbol and not humanfaces.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:33 pm
by Finaero
Yeah, would be pretty odd to see someone girls panties and they'd have freaking Jarre's face on them.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:12 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Velodynamic : I just told how idiot it can be to sell that. Images are not very good, even a child can do better.
Instead of that, they can do better things, I think.... or maybe they try to make money to pay a tour to JMJ :D

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:20 pm
by Velodynamic
noyau wrote:Velodynamic : I just told how idiot it can be to sell that. Images are not very good, even a child can do better.
Instead of that, they can do better things, I think.... or maybe they try to make money to pay a tour to JMJ :D
Allrighty then...now I'm with you, pal ! :idea: :)
However, them shirts was'nt that bad after all...
Image
Darn! I'm terribly sorry for that mistake...won't happen again, promise. :)

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:50 pm
by Equinoxe
Shame they dont sell Denim trousers!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We could have called them OXY-Jeans!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:20 pm
by Livgivare
What about this idea???

http://images3.fotopic.net/?iid=yx5bkg& ... noresize=1

Love Leelene