Page 20 of 24

Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:21 pm
by JPQ
Maybe some vsts is my current wish list one/two analog emulations (one for basses mainly and other one mainly not rob papen blue or linplug albino type pads or augur (freewave synth) type pads something what is hard describe also my synthbass taste is hard) and something for acoustic drums.:) but more important more talent make human feeling drums. becouse i have decent acoustic drums even now. but i must test more free vsts i must choose only few synths becouse its hard rember what synths sounds what. why not hardware? simple reason price and secondly these need more room space. and there is much good sounding new synths second hand have some times many problems needs repairing etc. and often in analogs there is no midi.
ps. i tested waldorf largo its not for me.:( and i must look more tr-rack soon i can. even i cannot modify patches why? i have odd problem.

Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:49 pm
by Jarp2600
JPQ wrote:Maybe some vsts is my current wish list one/two analog emulations (one for basses mainly and other one mainly not rob papen blue or linplug albino type pads or augur (freewave synth) type pads something what is hard describe also my synthbass taste is hard) and something for acoustic drums.:) but more important more talent make human feeling drums. becouse i have decent acoustic drums even now. but i must test more free vsts i must choose only few synths becouse its hard rember what synths sounds what. why not hardware? simple reason price and secondly these need more room space. and there is much good sounding new synths second hand have some times many problems needs repairing etc. and often in analogs there is no midi.
ps. i tested waldorf largo its not for me.:( and i must look more tr-rack soon i can. even i cannot modify patches why? i have odd problem.
For the drums: Don't quantize everything to hell, a few milliseconds behind of after the "beat" makes sounding them more realistic. Further, play a bit with different velocities. Don't make every hihat sound as loud as the one before, and slightly compress the whole drumtrack a bit.

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:37 am
by JPQ
Jarp2600 wrote:
JPQ wrote:Maybe some vsts is my current wish list one/two analog emulations (one for basses mainly and other one mainly not rob papen blue or linplug albino type pads or augur (freewave synth) type pads something what is hard describe also my synthbass taste is hard) and something for acoustic drums.:) but more important more talent make human feeling drums. becouse i have decent acoustic drums even now. but i must test more free vsts i must choose only few synths becouse its hard rember what synths sounds what. why not hardware? simple reason price and secondly these need more room space. and there is much good sounding new synths second hand have some times many problems needs repairing etc. and often in analogs there is no midi.
ps. i tested waldorf largo its not for me.:( and i must look more tr-rack soon i can. even i cannot modify patches why? i have odd problem.
For the drums: Don't quantize everything to hell, a few milliseconds behind of after the "beat" makes sounding them more realistic. Further, play a bit with different velocities. Don't make every hihat sound as loud as the one before, and slightly compress the whole drumtrack a bit.
i know these kwantising tips. and i must look compressor even now i cannot rember what freeware compressors are good :) and what values are good for start. its this good:
http://www.kjaerhusaudio.com/classic-compressor.php
ps. looks clear i mean i dont like messy guis

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:00 pm
by radek tymecki
CLASSIC makes INCREDIBLE GOOD VST's

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:53 pm
by matt222
I think Oliver has just created my fantasy item with his Midi MP7 with seperate outs WOW, what a clever guy!

Mind you, A lime-green Waldorf Wave still sounds good..........

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:33 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Equinoxe wrote:As for its VL(acoustic emulation) stuff,perhaps maybe a little old in terms of what we have today,but they are passable and at the time of release I suspect would have been very good,certainly gives the Moss Board or Z1/Prophecy a run for its money.
What would be the best rack synth for that sort of acoustic sounds ?

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:34 pm
by GeeJee
Nico_Noyau wrote:
Equinoxe wrote:As for its VL(acoustic emulation) stuff,perhaps maybe a little old in terms of what we have today,but they are passable and at the time of release I suspect would have been very good,certainly gives the Moss Board or Z1/Prophecy a run for its money.
What would be the best rack synth for that sort of acoustic sounds ?
Physical Modelling???

Pfff. You don't want that, believe me. :mrgreen:
Programming a DX7 is a piece of cake compared to that shit.
If you want just acoustic sounds like Piano, Ac. Guitar etc.. get a decent rompler... :wink2:

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:46 pm
by Nico_Noyau
I only have the souvenir of the Korg Prophecy a friend used once, it had a wonderful, beautiful and perfect sax sound. So now I am after that kind of perfectness in acoustic sounds, as the Prophecy can do it, and I thought that was that synthesis Equinoxe was talking about, was I wrong ?
I don't think... the MOSS, which can be found on the Korg Karma for example, seems to be a very good card, and I don't think you need to dig into deep synthesis to have an acoustic sound, nop ?

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:03 pm
by GeeJee
MOSS board is very good. At least that's what I'm told.

I don't know what type of synthesis is used in the Prophecy to produce this type of sax sound. But the V-Synth XT is also pretty convincing with its AP Synthesis.

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:37 pm
by Nico_Noyau
I think the Prophecy has an inboard MOSS car, need to check that.

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:04 pm
by GeeJee
MOSS is just VA, afaik.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:31 am
by JPQ
i must add some more vas vstis.:) reason i found there is more differences in these what thinked... and of course something else maybe. but this year i not sure if anything gomes my music equiment. all depends many things.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:25 pm
by Pete
JPQ, do you use an automatic translator? Try a better one! :D
What does it mean: "but this year i not sure if anything gomes my music equiment"

( ;-) Just kidding)

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:30 pm
by JPQ
Pete wrote:JPQ, do you use an automatic translator? Try a better one! :D
What does it mean: "but this year i not sure if anything gomes my music equiment"
No i dont use actually i very poor writing in english (not my native language) and listenins also its pain but reading goes well. and i mean i dont know if i buy any music stuff this year.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:42 pm
by Pete
JPQ wrote:
Pete wrote:JPQ, do you use an automatic translator? Try a better one! :D
What does it mean: "but this year i not sure if anything gomes my music equiment"
No i dont use actually i very poor writing in english (not my native language) and listenins also its pain but reading goes well. and i mean i dont know if i buy any music stuff this year.
I was just joking, no offense intended. Sometimes automatic translators create funny sentences.
It's not my language too, I don't even know how many mistakes I do per sentence...
Good luck with your wish list!