Page 18 of 26
audio recording
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:17 pm
by LeoDaV
Hello everybody this morning i have ripped with youtube downloader the movie and converted it to mp3
the i cut te cracking sound in the beginning and then split it i seperated tracks.
here is the link of it
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=IGY1EFPG
Let me know wich one is better or if anyone have a beter version.
please upload a dvd recoring from this concert watch for audio sync
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:17 pm
by LeoDaV
radek tymecki wrote:arp??
btw can You give us the photo of oxy 4 lead patch ??
btw when i heard those "stars" i tought it was yammy cs

Somehow I knew I was going to get that question

.... it's not a difficult sound really... if you have the right gear

....
I have to warn you: Arturia's 2600 is NOT like the real 2600 if you feed it with the correct settings (compared to mine) then you'll notice the sound IS different. For a better digital repesentation you should use the TimeWARP 2600...
Wich reminds me you did not give wich ARP in your answer

... but anyway here is the patch:
Don't mind the wires... none is used for the o4 patch...
Have fun
J.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:12 am
by Nico_Noyau
What a great machine.....

And thanks for the photo Johan, I make the patch on my TimeWARP2600

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:23 am
by GeeJee
Wow - that's really nice LeoDav... I'll try when I have my own 2600... one day..

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:07 am
by LeoDaV
noyau wrote:What a great machine.....

And thanks for the photo Johan, I make the patch on my TimeWARP2600

Be sure to post the result here too

so we can have a nice analog vs digital comparison.... Try to make the second part (the one that sounds distorted)... I bet you won't get any digital version to do that... the secret is the modulation of the cutoff at audio frequencies...(in this case VCO 2)
As you can hear on the last sound it's like some delay or so is used... it's not.. the sound comes directly from the 2600. Because the springs of the reverb are individually activated you can hear some form of delay. There is also mechanical feedback...
@GeeJee: start saving some cash

I hope you can get one one day it's a dream machine...
J.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:15 am
by Nico_Noyau
Well, I have some problems when recreating the sound, I'm not a god with this synth...
I'll try to post you a MP3 and a screen print

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:26 am
by Mogwai
LeoDaV wrote:
I have to warn you: Arturia's 2600 is NOT like the real 2600 if you feed it with the correct settings (compared to mine) then you'll notice the sound IS different. For a better digital repesentation you should use the TimeWARP 2600...
Offtopic: I agree totally with that. But I think it fits pretty well on all of Arturias software. They look good, sound pretty analog but not like the synths they're trying to emulate. I think that Gmedia/Gforce is doing better job on that.
Re: Pitch control
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:29 am
by GeeJee
juanito wrote:Hi Matt, Hi All
Great cover! Best i heard till now. So how do you control the bass pitch? Wich arp 2600 do you use? Arp 2600, Arp 2600v or TimeWARP 2600?
Juanito
None of them. He wrote about that

I think he used a NordLead 2x if I remember correctly.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:29 am
by GeeJee
Mogwai wrote:LeoDaV wrote:
I have to warn you: Arturia's 2600 is NOT like the real 2600 if you feed it with the correct settings (compared to mine) then you'll notice the sound IS different. For a better digital repesentation you should use the TimeWARP 2600...
Offtopic: I agree totally with that. But I think it fits pretty well on all of Arturias software. They look good, sound pretty analog but not like the synths they're trying to emulate. I think that Gmedia/Gforce is doing better job on that.
IMHO moog emulations are pretty 99% close...

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:31 pm
by Mogwai
Oh yes. The Moog Modular is a very good emulation. So is the Minimoog even though I like Minimosta better.
The problem for me with Arturia is the CS80V, ARP2600V and the Prophet V...they sound warm and all that but not very much like the real ones. It's like they've just taken their Moog-emulations and put it in a different cover. More graphics than actual soundemulation!?
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:12 pm
by Mogwai
OK, I've bought a new soundcard for my PC a few days ago (Terratec Phase X24 FW) which is my very first attempt to start recording music in my computer...yeah yeah...I know I'm late.
Today I started to record and used one of my favorite synthesizers. A very fun experience but still very new to me. Cubase LE is somewhat buggy but still its perfect for me.

Beware of bad mixing and other things! It's just a test.
Well, here it is. 1 hardware synthesizer, recorded on four tracks. Only effects...reverb and a little bit of delay.
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 49007F6373
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:23 pm
by Nico_Noyau
The link doesn't wanna work...
Ahh, I'm happy for you

Great news !
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:09 pm
by Mogwai
Thanks Noyau!
Strange with the link though? It works for me.
First you come to a webpage and then there's a link to a small file called The Mystery.mp3.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:19 pm
by LeoDaV
Nord Modular?
J.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:27 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Mogwai wrote:Thanks Noyau!
Strange with the link though? It works for me.
First you come to a webpage and then there's a link to a small file called The Mystery.mp3.
The page starts to load and it is written "Error when loading"
