Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:13 pm
The guy will be 63 this year. He doesn't need to be challenged anymore.
Jean-Michel Jarre discussion forum
https://zoolook.nl/forum/
For you and I, it's a matter of opinion and perspective; not fact.Dr_Jones wrote:The guy will be 63 this year. He doesn't need to be challenged anymore.
Most people only know a few hits, the people who know more, are 'interested' at least, and don't mind some lesser known stuff. Add to that, tunes like MF4, Chrono4 or Oxy8 are easy to listen to, they may not be recognized and picked up from the first notes, but one verse and chorus into the song, everybody knows what its about. As for Arpeggiator and Calypso 2, these have been fan favourites for a long time.MiVo wrote:We must not forget the occasion this concert is for, it comes on Euronews and live online too. This is in my opinion not a concert for us fans only, but for a wide public, then I expect him to play his greatest hits, like oxy 2 and 4, magn, fields 2 and equinoxe 5 to name a few examples, seems a bit odd to leave them out for a concert like that will be in Monaco.

If he's charging to entry then the show should target fans more, so the usual track list that he's had since forever it a bit of a disappointment, but for a big free event like this then it has to cater for as many as possible so the popular, well known stuff works best so you can forgive.GeeJee wrote:Most people only know a few hits, the people who know more, are 'interested' at least, and don't mind some lesser known stuff. Add to that, tunes like MF4, Chrono4 or Oxy8 are easy to listen to, they may not be recognized and picked up from the first notes, but one verse and chorus into the song, everybody knows what its about. As for Arpeggiator and Calypso 2, these have been fan favourites for a long time.MiVo wrote:We must not forget the occasion this concert is for, it comes on Euronews and live online too. This is in my opinion not a concert for us fans only, but for a wide public, then I expect him to play his greatest hits, like oxy 2 and 4, magn, fields 2 and equinoxe 5 to name a few examples, seems a bit odd to leave them out for a concert like that will be in Monaco.
As for the current tracklist, the things that are getting annoying now are this Adagio thing (it goes nowhere, really), Oxy 5 + Variation 3 (neat, but I've heard it by now) and Industrial Revolution 2 (which doesn't really work on its own without pts 1 and 3). JMJ composed so much music that I tend to forget some of it from time to time.. and rediscover.
Exactly. He's not doing this for the fans, he's doing this for the masses.qube wrote: If he's charging to entry then the show should target fans more, so the usual track list that he's had since forever it a bit of a disappointment, but for a big free event like this then it has to cater for as many as possible so the popular, well known stuff works best so you can forgive.
It's pretty forgetful to say Jarre is going down the hill. He has been doing some pretty good and pretty crazy projects the last 10 years. Concerts in the middle of nowhere (Aero and Marocco), one of his best shows ever (Gdansk), sideprojects nobody excpected (S2K and GOL, jazzy stuff showing a different side), and two different tours. T&T wasnt everyone's cup of tea but it was still different and experimental, and it did challenge JMJ.Vumiko wrote:Consider that his last MAJOR musical effort was Metamorphoses; that was over 10 years ago. Since then we've had little side projects (Sessions 2000, GOL), compilations (AERO, Essentials) and one very weak album (T&T) that he admits was a mistake. Overall, since 2000, his creative output has been rather unimpressive and he simply doesn't seem interested or inspired in terms of new musical ideas and direction. Think about it for a moment: only ONE major musical effort in the past 10 years. (I love Metamorphoses BTW). That's a serious decrease in output. In America, we call that "going down hill".
GlennFolkvord wrote:Nope Glenn, I can judge an Artist however I see fit; just as you can. My personal conclusions may differ than yours; but I can't say your way of judging is "right" any more than you can mine. We simply disagree and have a different perspective on the matter.Vumiko wrote: So, while you are entitled to your opinion of course, when judging an artist you have to put your personal demands away and look at what actually has happened. Otherwise what you are actually judging is how the artist matches your own demands, and that is something else.
Peace from the USA..