Page 116 of 167
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 2:09 am
by Dr_Jones
No Travelator part 1?
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 3:45 am
by cygnusx-1
Kanta wrote:
1.The Time Machine JMJ & X
2.GloryJMJ & M83
3.Close Your Eyes JMJ & X
4.Automatic, Pt. 1 JMJ & Vince Clark
5.Automatic, Pt. 2 JMJ & Vince Clark
6.If! JMJ & X
7.Immortals JMJ & X
8.Suns Have Gone JMJ & X
9.Conquistador JMJ & Gesaffelstein
10. Travelator, Pt. 2JMJ & X
11.Zero GravityJMJ & Tangerine Dream
12.Rely on Me JMJ & X
13.Stardust JMJ & Armin van Buuren
14.Watching youJMJ & 3D (Massive Attack)
15. A Question of Blood JMJ & John Howard Carpenter
16.The Train & The River JMJ & X
17.Continuous Mix – JMJ
Doing the math, the missing collaborators then should be:
1. Little Boots
2. Gary Numan
3. Boris Blank
4. Pete Townshend
5. Air
6. Fuck Buttons
7. Laurie Anderson
8. Moby
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 6:58 am
by jeanbatman
Maybe the album should start off with Pete Townshend since he is the oldest guy and this album is a travel in time…
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:23 am
by jerome
cygnusx-1 wrote:Kanta wrote:
1.The Time Machine JMJ & X
2.GloryJMJ & M83
3.Close Your Eyes JMJ & X
4.Automatic, Pt. 1 JMJ & Vince Clark
5.Automatic, Pt. 2 JMJ & Vince Clark
6.If! JMJ & X
7.Immortals JMJ & X
8.Suns Have Gone JMJ & X
9.Conquistador JMJ & Gesaffelstein
10. Travelator, Pt. 2JMJ & X
11.Zero GravityJMJ & Tangerine Dream
12.Rely on Me JMJ & X
13.Stardust JMJ & Armin van Buuren
14.Watching youJMJ & 3D (Massive Attack)
15. A Question of Blood JMJ & John Howard Carpenter
16.The Train & The River JMJ & X
17.Continuous Mix – JMJ
Doing the math, the missing collaborators then should be:
1. Little Boots
2. Gary Numan
3. Boris Blank
4. Pete Townshend
5. Air
6. Fuck Buttons
7. Laurie Anderson
8. Moby
And Trent Reznor, and David Lynch, and Chemical Brothers, and Portishead, and Sebastien Tellier... all already quoted by themselves or by other collaborators or in the press... So the math is still hazardous at this stage.
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:07 am
by cygnusx-1
jerome wrote:And Trent Reznor, and David Lynch, and Chemical Brothers, and Portishead, and Sebastien Tellier... all already quoted by themselves or by other collaborators or in the press... So the math is still hazardous at this stage.
Must have missed that.
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 11:52 am
by Christophe
jerome wrote:And Trent Reznor, and David Lynch, and Chemical Brothers, and Portishead, and Sebastien Tellier... all already quoted by themselves or by other collaborators or in the press... So the math is still hazardous at this stage.
May be they are for part 2 next year?
Greetings,
Christophe
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 12:36 pm
by (Unknown)
Christophe wrote:jerome wrote:And Trent Reznor, and David Lynch, and Chemical Brothers, and Portishead, and Sebastien Tellier... all already quoted by themselves or by other collaborators or in the press... So the math is still hazardous at this stage.
May be they are for part 2 next year?
Greetings,
Christophe
Yes, maybe. This is what came to my mind also.
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 3:54 pm
by (Unknown)
Jean-Michel Jarre and Gary Numan
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 6:04 pm
by Finaero
I'm sorry, but if "Time Machine" is really going to be real name (or subtitle) and the first track will be named as such... well, I really have to force myself to not associate it with
this band.
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2015 7:44 pm
by (Unknown)
Finaero wrote:I'm sorry, but if "Time Machine" is really going to be real name (or subtitle) and the first track will be named as such... well, I really have to force myself to not associate it with
this band.
If you start peeking for artists since the 80's who have used the word "time" or "time machine" in their titles there must be hundreds maybe even thousands...
I don't mind though. There are a lot worse titles for an album.
http://www.nme.com/list/the-50-worst-al ... ver/371815
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 4:40 am
by Christophe
Finaero wrote:I'm sorry, but if "Time Machine" is really going to be real name (or subtitle) and the first track will be named as such... well, I really have to force myself to not associate it with
this band.
I don't associate it with anything. For me it is a album name like any other one. The most important to me is the music and then the title. But of course the album title need to reflect the album concept!
Greetings,
Christophe
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 10:55 am
by Christophe
jeanbatman wrote:Maybe the album should start off with Pete Townshend since he is the oldest guy and this album is a travel in time…
It have no real sense if they will go from oldest to youngest. Because the second track is "Glory" with M83 and he is not the second oldest. : wink:
Greetings,
Christophe
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 2:02 pm
by cygnusx-1
Christophe wrote:jeanbatman wrote:Maybe the album should start off with Pete Townshend since he is the oldest guy and this album is a travel in time…
It have no real sense if they will go from oldest to youngest. Because the second track is "Glory" with M83 and he is not the second oldest.
So obviously there is no chronological order, but why split it up into two parts? "The Time Machine" already implies to cover the concept of spanning 40 years of electronic music.
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 5:10 pm
by (Unknown)
With this album, I would like to see Jarre getting back onto the highlight of Music scene in his native France.
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:17 pm
by Christophe
cygnusx-1 wrote:Christophe wrote:jeanbatman wrote:Maybe the album should start off with Pete Townshend since he is the oldest guy and this album is a travel in time…
It have no real sense if they will go from oldest to youngest. Because the second track is "Glory" with M83 and he is not the second oldest.
So obviously there is no chronological order, but why split it up into two parts? "The Time Machine" already implies to cover the concept of spanning 40 years of electronic music.
Maybe to much tracks to fit in one disc? Or maybe it's a concept? Who knows?
Greetings,
Christophe