BlahBlahCafe - Jean-Michel Jarre forum

Jote wrote:Full version on official JeanMichelJarreVEVO channel

Allways the same : Not available in Germany

guilty of CISAC/Gema

Black Bird wrote:

Jote wrote:Full version on official JeanMichelJarreVEVO channel

Allways the same : Not available in Germany

guilty of CISAC/Gema

Try again later - some of the videos on that channel were also not available in my country, but were made available a day later or so.

Jote wrote:

Kanta wrote:Image
Jean-Michel Jarre & Armin van Buuren - Stardust [ASOT724] **TUNE OF THE WEEK**
Published on 30 July 2015 by A State Of Trance
Video:

Thanks for this!

"Armin van Buuren pres Rising Star Remix" though? At the end he says it's the premiere of the "album version".

The information was given at the time of uploading but since then corrected by the uploader of the video.

Jote wrote:Full version on official JeanMichelJarreVEVO channel

OMFG! This is the Jarre I've been waiting for 35 years or so...

Okay, now it's easily my favorite track of the collaborations thus far. Even though the 3:00-3:10 part where the, uh, Popcorn part kicks in sounds really lackluster compared to the cut edits from before >_>

I'm somehow reminded of Elwood's "Little man", which in turn reminds me of Chronologie IV (esp. the chorus)

Radio Edit

Amazing!!.

ralf wrote:

Radio Edit

Amazing!!.

Yes, is amazing! A little bit different then the album version.

Greetings,


Christophe

Blimey, this really might be my favorite JMJ track in 18 years (sorry, Paris Bourges). Here's hoping there will be some neat extended mixes coming up for it.

Very nice radio edit, too!

Finaero wrote:Blimey, this really might be my favorite JMJ track in 18 years (sorry, Paris Bourges). Here's hoping there will be some neat extended mixes coming up for it.

Very nice radio edit, too!

I hope that too, for some neat extended mixes. And that they not only appear on YouTube but on iTunes or cd too, not necessary on vinyl because I can't play it. This track deserve it!

Greetings,


Christophe

Why a radio edit? I've heard much longer tracks on the radio. Just cut the first ten seconds and the final and it's done...

shadow wrote:Why a radio edit? I've heard much longer tracks on the radio. Just cut the first ten seconds and the final and it's done...

A radio edit is most of the time without the slow parts of the album version. Listen to the radio edit of C'est La Vie. Is shorter too without the slower part. And I like the radio edit of Stardust too. This one is not only cut the beginning and some slower parts, far from that. But there are some other effects too in it and little bit different mixed too. If you don't like it, don't listen then too it.

Greetings,


Christophe

I know why they exist, I just don't see the need for it in this case considering the track only lasts 4 minutes with the intro. Just cut that out and don't change a thing. Would work just fine...

shadow wrote:I know why they exist, I just don't see the need for it in this case considering the track only lasts 4 minutes with the intro. Just cut that out and don't change a thing. Would work just fine...

Maybe it will work fine when you cut the intro. You have a reason. But I don't see any problems with special radio edits. I was wondered that the radio edit of Glory was so different to the original one. I thought they will cut only some parts of the original one. In other cases they say radio edit on to other tracks from Jarre and it's still the original version (for example Oxygene 10) and track length.

Greetings,


Christophe

I'm really liking this - It would be nice to have a version leaning more towards Jarre's input without that cheesy 'dancefloor build-up' in the middle perhaps. But thats just me being picky - nice to hear something great again! Van Buren is good at what he does and has made some great songs with people.