Same here. Haven't played my Equinoxe vinyl since 2004.GeeJee wrote:I think I've never heard the LP version. Well, I'm sure I have, but I was like 2 years old back then. Don't really remember
Blah Blah Cafe, the Jean-Michel Jarre forum
Same here. Haven't played my Equinoxe vinyl since 2004.GeeJee wrote:I think I've never heard the LP version. Well, I'm sure I have, but I was like 2 years old back then. Don't really remember
Do you mean the arpeggio? I think that is lower in the LP verison than in the CD verison.Synthesist wrote:The lower part (or what this is called) of the lead is more clear in the CD version, if you gte what I mean... It is more than an octave lower.
No, the one in Rarities 6 is the single version, which is the 'newer' one.Finaero wrote:If the LP version is the same as in Rarities 6, then I hear no difference between it and CD version. Geez.
No I mean the lead itself. It starts out just like a one hand lead abd then like it was two handed (this technic is said to be done in another way though). It is difficult exactly to tell what I mean. Try listen to the cd version at 1:04, a lower note part of the lead is played in the background, this is much more clear in the CD version compared to the LP version (if the LP version is that from the rareties 4Mogan wrote:Do you mean the arpeggio? I think that is lower in the LP verison than in the CD verison.Synthesist wrote:The lower part (or what this is called) of the lead is more clear in the CD version, if you gte what I mean... It is more than an octave lower.
I don't have the original LP, so this could always be mixing related.
There are probably differences on the CD's, they have been remastered a couple of times.AnDrOiD wrote:Equinoxe Part 5; Vinyl album version + CD album version = identical.
Original CD version that is. Can't talk about no CD remaster shit.
Ah, I see. You mean the half-octave voice witch also plays the lead? I saw that was on an notation sheet I found on internet.Synthesist wrote:No I mean the lead itself. It starts out just like a one hand lead abd then like it was two handed (this technic is said to be done in another way though). It is difficult exactly to tell what I mean. Try listen to the cd version at 1:04, a lower note part of the lead is played in the background, this is much more clear in the CD version compared to the LP version (if the LP version is that from the rareties 4Mogan wrote:Do you mean the arpeggio? I think that is lower in the LP verison than in the CD verison.Synthesist wrote:The lower part (or what this is called) of the lead is more clear in the CD version, if you gte what I mean... It is more than an octave lower.
Yes, it is that. I think that isn't just as loud from the original version. It is still there though.Mogan wrote:Ah, I see. You mean the half-octave voice witch also plays the lead? I saw that was on an notation sheet I found on internet.Synthesist wrote:No I mean the lead itself. It starts out just like a one hand lead abd then like it was two handed (this technic is said to be done in another way though). It is difficult exactly to tell what I mean. Try listen to the cd version at 1:04, a lower note part of the lead is played in the background, this is much more clear in the CD version compared to the LP version (if the LP version is that from the rareties 4Mogan wrote: Do you mean the arpeggio? I think that is lower in the LP verison than in the CD verison.
..hope to change it one day I could send the version from the rareties 4 bootleg. That version is called 'LP version 78' so I guess that's the one, but I know noyau has it on his server, I got it from there and I know you two are chatting on Messenger so he might send it more quicklyRonja wrote:I haven't heard the LP version.
