Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:29 pm
by Jarreshair
Can I add how brilliant I think the official video is?
It's like something Peter Gabriel would do.


Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:36 pm
by Dr_Jones
That's Jean-Pierre Jeunet for you.

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:58 pm
by shadow
We really need a Blu-ray with all music videos remastered. Scan the filmstock in at 4K and remaster that and clean the VHS tapes as much as you can and have a note on the disc that quality will vary due too the source.

I'd eat that right up! :nod:

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:44 pm
by Jote
Ok, this deviates from the topic a bit.

There's something that I can't understand about the 2nd (1985) edition. The track listing states:

1. Ethnicolor (11:45)
2. Diva (7:12)

Yet every single CD-rip of this supposed edition that I've ever encountered does not contain tracks of above durations. Ethnicolor is 11:40 (and does not differ from the 1st edition to my knowledge, as opposed to 3rd edition which actually has a couple of extra seconds in the middle) while Diva is 7:30+.

What gives? Is the track listing incorrect?

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:24 pm
by shadow
The three editions of the album that I have are:

1st:
Ethnicolor - 11:42
Diva - 7:32

2nd:
Ethnicolor - 11:40
Diva - 7:33

3rd:
Ethnicolor - 11:47
Diva - 7:20

I guess they just mislabeled the exact length.

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:44 pm
by Jote
Yeah, I pretty much came to the same conclusion, seeing that all copies around the web are like that and there were no extra notes on discogs (or wikipedia) about this. Just wanted to make sure.

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:53 am
by Jote
jerome wrote:
Violator wrote:
shadow wrote:What different versions? I'm aware of the original pressing that split Second and Fifth Rendez-vous in multiple parts. But I don't recall it actually having a new mixing (minus the missing beat in the fourth track).
Credits from the 2nd version:
[url=http://thumbnails113.imagebam.com/43478/6ca7eb434778331.jpg]Image[/URL]

The difference between 2 versions is in slightly different version of 4th rendez-vous. In the 1st case the track was mixed by Ermelin and Vanzetto. In the 2nd case it was mixed by Kervorkian.
Wow. Never noticed this before. Thanks. Strangely, to my knowledge, this difference does not appear on any french issue.
Otherwise, 1st version was mixed by Ermelin and Geiss (not Vanzetto)
Is there any discernible difference between those two versions?

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:47 am
by RemarkableRadio
Hi guys,
I am always fascinated by fans that are discussing differences in songs of sometimes 1 or 2 seconds. Or if a pitch in one version is different from the other.
I only have all original recordings that I bought when they came out. I have ignored all remasters and rereleases. If I read all the posts about those, I made the right choice.
Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:52 am
by Finaero
Why not? ;)

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:36 pm
by Dr_Jones
RemarkableRadio wrote:Hi guys,
I am always fascinated by fans that are discussing differences in songs of sometimes 1 or 2 seconds. Or if a pitch in one version is different from the other.
I only have all original recordings that I bought when they came out. I have ignored all remasters and rereleases. If I read all the posts about those, I made the right choice.
Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?
For science!

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:48 pm
by Jote
RemarkableRadio wrote:Why is it so important to have one song 10 times when it basically sounds the same?
Because your "basically the same" can be "different enough" to someone else.

I'm pretty sure there are people who would say that Equinoxe V from "800 025-2 01" and "800 025-2 02" is "basically the same"