Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:37 pm
the difference is very small.JPQ wrote:Its even true we need old version Smallstone phaser ? sometimes heared something like this i think.
it's a bit of an audiophile-like-nonsense-debate.
Jean-Michel Jarre discussion forum
https://zoolook.nl/forum/
the difference is very small.JPQ wrote:Its even true we need old version Smallstone phaser ? sometimes heared something like this i think.
Its nice know why new is easier get if i want. and actually i dont want exact jarre patches maybe at all expect maybe some...GeeJee wrote:the difference is very small.JPQ wrote:Its even true we need old version Smallstone phaser ? sometimes heared something like this i think.
it's a bit of an audiophile-like-nonsense-debate.
Truth is Jarre uses concerts so much not so usefull stuff but this is not problem to me anyway. And made so many different versions of tunes using different synths i think.Jakob BC wrote:That's a common one. I bet he would say something like "tsk, I could do all that with just a laptop and a MIDI-keyboard"Normund wrote:I read this discussion and have not much to add to this, except that I remembered what someone who purported to be a musical critic wrote in his review of the concert JM gave in my city. He said that if he had been in Jarre's shoes he probably could have done the same with less instruments on the stage.
But it would sound like shite.Jakob BC wrote:That's a common one. I bet he would say something like "tsk, I could do all that with just a laptop and a MIDI-keyboard"Normund wrote:I read this discussion and have not much to add to this, except that I remembered what someone who purported to be a musical critic wrote in his review of the concert JM gave in my city. He said that if he had been in Jarre's shoes he probably could have done the same with less instruments on the stage.