Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:33 pm
by radek tymecki
radek tymecki wrote:sell 106 buy an1x for sure :)
Seriously ? :?:

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:26 pm
by jeremy
Thanks ;)

I'll certainly record a few things with it in the coming weeks.

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:04 pm
by jeremy
jeremy wrote:I'll certainly record a few things with it in the coming weeks.
No I won't :hypocrit:

Sold for 525 euros last week. LOL

Sold the Juno 106 for 500 euros the same weekend.

Sold some other stuff. And still have a few small things to sell.

Used the money to buy a new PC, an Alesis Multimix 16 USB2.0 and I just ordered Sonar 7 Producer Edition. I'll see what I can do with that software, and if I'm not happy with the reverbs, I might buy a good professional reverb plug-in and hopefully that would be my definitive set up for a few years of recording to come.

Edit: I sampled all the good drum sounds of the SY99 in my Fantom X6 of course.

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:55 am
by GeeJee
Not bad. But the original, man, is HUGE. This goes like...

dimdadim tja-dimdadim dadimdadim...

while the original goes like...

POWAAAA DOODOO POWAAA DOODOODEDOODEDOODOODOO :nod:

Wiz ozzer worz: it sounds little tiny thinny-skinny to me :nod:

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:15 am
by radek tymecki
hmmm thiz on?

http://www.jeanmicheljarre.pl/radek/sam ... 7bass3.mp3

i'll work on it during mix

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:46 am
by Analog-Umph
Yes that's a bit thin and digital-like radek, actually pretty lifeless in a 1:1 comparison.

Plus the original is supplemented by a phat kick drum.

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:53 am
by radek tymecki
I know :) I'll have to boost it a bit in a mix when i'll start making replica :P

But i hav to say that the sound as sound is very very close :)

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:02 pm
by GeeJee
You should ask Vince. He once sent me a sample of someone who had replicated this sound on his An1x and it sounded just exactly the same. Well. 98%.

I think the trick word is compression :nod:

Not bad, the third effort, not bad at all 8)

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:24 pm
by Jarp2600
GeeJee wrote:You should ask Vince. He once sent me a sample of someone who had replicated this sound on his An1x and it sounded just exactly the same. Well. 98%.

I think the trick word is compression :nod:

Not bad, the third effort, not bad at all 8)
Hmm, compression on a synthsequence? :nico: Sounds pretty pointless to me :')

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:35 pm
by radek tymecki
oh sorry accidentally deleted my sounds so here's better one

http://www.jeanmicheljarre.pl/radek/sam ... 7bass4.mp3

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:58 pm
by Nico_Noyau
You are hard, this attempt is very good, ok, not as powerful, but still good, it's just a matter of mixing now ;)

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:21 am
by Jakob BC
That's the best so far :)

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:49 am
by Pete
radek tymecki wrote:oh sorry accidentally deleted my sounds so here's better one

http://www.jeanmicheljarre.pl/radek/sam ... 7bass4.mp3
Really nice, Radek.
You did a very good job and showed once more how the AN1x is an underrated VA synth...

P.

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:21 am
by GeeJee
Jarp2600 wrote:
GeeJee wrote:You should ask Vince. He once sent me a sample of someone who had replicated this sound on his An1x and it sounded just exactly the same. Well. 98%.

I think the trick word is compression :nod:

Not bad, the third effort, not bad at all 8)
Hmm, compression on a synthsequence? :nico: Sounds pretty pointless to me :')
Then don't try it, I'd say. :fine:

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:17 am
by radek tymecki
Pete wrote:
radek tymecki wrote:oh sorry accidentally deleted my sounds so here's better one

http://www.jeanmicheljarre.pl/radek/sam ... 7bass4.mp3
Really nice, Radek.
You did a very good job and showed once more how the AN1x is an underrated VA synth...

P.
Thanks.

You're right. Also an1x has very very FAST envelopes :D