Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:08 pm
Unstable? If so, why were they used so much?Jarp2600 wrote:Yes, that's true. But those chips are pretty unstable. But indeed, they're a bit more expensive. Though, I would buy a Rev3 instead of a rev2.
BlahBlahCafe - Jean-Michel Jarre forum
Jean-Michel Jarre discussion forum
https://zoolook.nl/forum/
How much would you pay for a non working Prophet 5?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:10 pm
The sound is wonderful, that's mainly why I want to have one, but it looks also great, I love Sequential Circuits' synths' look 
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:55 pm
Yes, because of the sound. Rev3 is much more stable, but has a thinner sound.jarrekid wrote:Unstable? If so, why were they used so much?Jarp2600 wrote:Yes, that's true. But those chips are pretty unstable. But indeed, they're a bit more expensive