Unstable? If so, why were they used so much?Jarp2600 wrote:Yes, that's true. But those chips are pretty unstable. But indeed, they're a bit more expensive. Though, I would buy a Rev3 instead of a rev2.
Unstable? If so, why were they used so much?Jarp2600 wrote:Yes, that's true. But those chips are pretty unstable. But indeed, they're a bit more expensive. Though, I would buy a Rev3 instead of a rev2.
Yes, because of the sound. Rev3 is much more stable, but has a thinner sound.jarrekid wrote:Unstable? If so, why were they used so much?Jarp2600 wrote:Yes, that's true. But those chips are pretty unstable. But indeed, they're a bit more expensive. Though, I would buy a Rev3 instead of a rev2.