Page 9 of 12
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:00 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Ah yes, you'll keep yours too ?

:lol:
So they could have called it JP9000 or something...
But it can't be a Jupiter serie, it is not enough beautiful...
A remake of the JP8k.... not for me, sorry...
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:08 pm
by Jarp2600
I would buy the JP. Much cheaper, and the same functions, and more.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:08 pm
by Equinoxe
I dont think the intention was to remarket it as part of the JP series,although its pretty much the same machine..I think its more aimed to be an educational tool towards synthesis,but also to combine both software and hardware applications too..
I agree it certainly doesnt seem to have inhereted the JPs good looks,thtas what i like about the JP its a mean machine capable of some awesome sounds,but it looks the part as well....
I've always said that the JP is by far one of the best looking synthesizers ever made,although i wish they would have made the build quality to match,by using metal casings like the old Jupiters...
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:41 pm
by dj_epo
look the sh32 ! it's nearly the same than the sh 201 !
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 6:13 am
by Velodynamic
dj_epo wrote:look the sh32 ! it's nearly the same than the sh 201 !
Really??

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:49 am
by GeeJee
I think it's quite different indeed...

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:19 pm
by Jakob BC
I don't think the SH-32 has the special oscillators which are the mainreasons why I like the SH-201.
Besides that, the SH-32 has other types of oscillators. They are some sort of based on samples. I don't know how that works, but I wouldn't touch it. Im probably just scraed because it is such a different system.
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:10 pm
by GeeJee
Oscillators based on samples are no oscillators, lol

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:26 pm
by Jakob BC
GeeJee wrote:Oscillators based on samples are no oscillators, lol

I don't remember what it was called and how it worked, but it was pretty weird.
Try some searching on google, and you should find something about it.
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:15 pm
by Jarp2600
And still, the 201 sounds like old newspapers.

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:10 pm
by Jakob BC
People says that it sounds too digitally others says the opposite, I still think it's a cool machine and I don't listen to other people I'll just by my own ears. If it sounds cool, I don't mind that it doesn't sound as analog as a Minimoog. It's not always about sounding analog, digital sounds good too.

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:14 pm
by Jarp2600
Yes, but this sounds like nothing. Really! Go and try one!
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:35 pm
by Nico_Noyau
LoL
But let's speak about this arpeggiator, is it a "up", "down" or "random" one ?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:36 pm
by Jakob BC
I would say so yes but unfortunately you can't see the tempo value on the synth itself

Anyway even though the JP has a knob instead ain't it based on exact values so there won't be any half tempo values etc.?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:45 pm
by Jarp2600
Jakob BC wrote:I would say so yes but unfortunately you can't see the tempo value on the synth itself

Anyway even though the JP has a knob instead ain't it based on exact values so there won't be any half tempo values etc.?
I guess it's just midi sends from 50 bpm until 250 bpm. Indeed, no half values
