Welcome to the new BlahBlahCafe!

Having trouble registering? You can contact us at the "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page.

The boards have been moved to a new server. If you have trouble signing in, or other problems on the boards, feel free to contact us.

All boards have been restored for Guests now.

New synth


Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:44 pm
Mogan


Posts: 502
Location: Bodø, Norway

I'm gonna buy a small, effective synth, and were thinking of the Korg Microsynth, because of the size, (but also the vocoder... :P) but I wonder if anybody else here has it or have anything to say about it...
Musical project: Aerotronik
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:06 pm
Nico_Noyau
Assistant Admin & Bootleg Expert

User avatar
Posts: 5682
Location: Aix en Provence, France
Likes received  : 1

MicroWhat ? I never heard about it....
Maybe you speak about the microKORG ? If yes, it is a very good synth ;)
Image Image
My music, webdev, photos, videos : www.nicolaskern.fr
Robert Dugenou

Attended :
Teo&Tea showcase in Cannes [France] - 20/05/2007
Théâtre Marigny, Paris [France] - 15/12/2007
<2010> Marseille [France] - 20/03/2010
Monaco - 01/07/2011
Arènes de Nîmes – 14/07/2016
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:33 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

Microsynth is KORG's new synth.... :D ;)
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:43 pm
Equinoxe


User avatar
Posts: 871
Location: "Between the Satellites"
Likes received  : 1

GeeJee wrote:Microsynth is KORG's new synth.... :D ;)

Quite a Nifty piece of gear,given that its based on the Triton Engine,it has some good sounds on it,Its kind of like a slimmed down Triton LE with a 2 octave keyboard...

Aimed more for the Laptop/Desktop musician or some one who wants great sounds without a great budget,think its around the £4-500 mark


the actual name is Micro X

I'm not sure if its availible yet in Europe,last time i spoke to my friend he said they hadnt begun production as yet and were only shipping demo units to the States.I'm still waiting to demo one in the UK :(
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:53 pm
jarrekid


User avatar
Posts: 1100
Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire, England

The MicroX is basically a Triton yes, in a different shape. This is good if you want digital sounds (pads, pianos, strings, etc.)
The microKorg is good for "analog" sounds (basses, leads) and is a super synth.
Buying both would be a good choice. :D
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:08 pm
Mogan


Posts: 502
Location: Bodø, Norway

MicroX is like a Triton but smaller. MicroKorg is another name on Microsynth. I were just wondering of expirience of it, not a name discussion... :? But thanks for the answers. I'll maybe buy the MicroX later. In half a year or something.
Musical project: Aerotronik
Post Posted Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:40 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

Well, what's your current setup? And do you have any experience in synthesis or programming sounds...?
Post Posted Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:09 am
jarrekid


User avatar
Posts: 1100
Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire, England

MicroKorg - better for beginners definitely.
Post Posted Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:28 am
Nico_Noyau
Assistant Admin & Bootleg Expert

User avatar
Posts: 5682
Location: Aix en Provence, France
Likes received  : 1

For my case, I would have vote for a midi keyboard with a lot of VSTs which can be found for free on internet (legally ;)) and after, Mogan can choose which type of synthesis he loves or which kind of synth he really want (synthesis or PCM or other).
So for my case I would buy a cheap synth like the D50 is, it has great sounds and can be used as master keyboard.

But that's only IMHO, that's how I am discovering synthesis and how synths really work and it doesn't cost me more than 300€ (included D50, PG1000 and soundcard).
Image Image
My music, webdev, photos, videos : www.nicolaskern.fr
Robert Dugenou

Attended :
Teo&Tea showcase in Cannes [France] - 20/05/2007
Théâtre Marigny, Paris [France] - 15/12/2007
<2010> Marseille [France] - 20/03/2010
Monaco - 01/07/2011
Arènes de Nîmes – 14/07/2016
Post Posted Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:34 am
AnDrOiD


User avatar
Posts: 4387
Location: Planet Tellus

Start out with this, lil' Mogan:
Image



:P :lol:
SOUNDCLOUD
Rhythmus muss sein!

"20 years ago we had computers in the studios. Now we have studios in the computers" - Michel Moers.
Post Posted Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:13 am
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR

User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands
Likes received  : 2

Oh you can be such a jørk sometimes... :D :lol: 8)
Post Posted Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:37 pm
PHASEREFFECT


Posts: 181

Me thinks (as curious it sounds, since it comes from -my- mouth!), it doesn´t matter if you use a DSP-driven Synth or Software, so i think that you´ll be with a cheapo Master-KB with a good Software in the result more than happy.And good free Software-Synths are more than enough outside there. My experience with VA wasn´t that good, since they´re all more or less cheap build, so when your MKorg/MSynth/MS2K/whatever dies, you´ll have only a piece of unusable Software inside of a DSP. Ok, you -have- something in your hands. 2K for example, nowadays usually not more worth than $300-$400, payed for mine about 6 Years ago over the double price. And their price won´t rise, except those, who are mainly known and much used in the pro-world, but the 2K definitive doesn´t belong there. On one kind seen i like this machine, on the other side i hate it.

I´ll give you the tip: Better concentrate yourself into making good music instead of never ending synth maintenance and correcting bad output signals. It kills your creativity like hell. No question, personally i still hate Software, cause the investment costs for a pro-studio bulild around software is still not cheaper than using "real" hardware and real analogue gear -has- simply a better quality, but meanwhile i say: Better a full analogue setup -or- software. This mixage of "half-analogue", VA and pure analogue equipment won´t work together without problems. And the listener doesn´t matter how "analogue" a sound appears, he only wanna get "included" into the "beauty" of your songs. Additionally, nowadays the person behind the music doesn´t interest no more, cause music has got a "consumer product", not a life attitude or a personal relationship like it was 20/30 years ago. Consider that in your choice.

Greetings
Stef
Post Posted Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:07 pm
AnDrOiD


User avatar
Posts: 4387
Location: Planet Tellus

GeeJee wrote:Oh you can be such a jørk sometimes... :D :lol: 8)
:lol:
SOUNDCLOUD
Rhythmus muss sein!

"20 years ago we had computers in the studios. Now we have studios in the computers" - Michel Moers.
Post Posted Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:57 pm
Mogan


Posts: 502
Location: Bodø, Norway

AnDrOiD wrote:Start out with this, lil' Mogan:
Image



:P :lol:
Jørk. I started woth something like that. I think it was a GEM... :P
Musical project: Aerotronik
Post Posted Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:12 pm
Jakob BC
English Moderator, Studio/Stage Expert

User avatar
Posts: 4344
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

Mogan wrote:
AnDrOiD wrote:Start out with this, lil' Mogan:
Image



:P :lol:
Jørk. I started woth something like that. I think it was a GEM... :P
So now GEM is ranked as something less good? :wink:
That doesn't matter, I don't know the quality of GEM.







  • 2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software